Cargando…
Fuente: Caselaw Access Project, Harvard Law School Library Innovation Lab (static.case.law); New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division; 302 A.D.2d 670; 754 N.Y.S.2d 721. Datos: https://static.case.law/ad2d/302/cases/0670-01.json. Opinión judicial de EE.UU. sin restricciones conocidas de uso: CAP levantó las restricciones el 2024-03-01 (prensa); el espejo HF free-law declara cc0-1.0; NO c… Abrir la fuente
Cargando el texto completo…
Carmean v. Royal Indemnity Co., 302 A.D.2d 670 (New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division, 2003) Lahtinen, J. Appeal from an order and judgment of the Supreme Court (Nolan, Jr., J.), entered December 10, 2001 in Saratoga County, which, inter alia, granted defendant Royal Indemnity Company’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint against it. Plaintiff seeks to compel defendant Royal Indemnity Company to indemnify its insured, defendant Peter A. Ozolins, for a default judgment that plaintiff obtained against Ozolins as a result of Ozolins cutting off plaintiff’s left ear with a knife. On July 5, 1997, plaintiff was sitting in the front passenger seat of Ozolins’ parked vehicle with his feet hanging out the window and his back to Ozolins while the two individuals engaged in a discussion. Ozolins removed a knife from his pocket, reached across the front of the vehicle from his position in the driver’s seat and cut off plaintiff’s left ear. Ozolins was arrested upon a charge of first degree assault and, in September 1997, entered a plea of guilty to second degree assault. Thereafter, plaintiff commenced a personal injury action against Ozolins. Ozolins resided with his parents, who had a homeowners’ insurance policy with Royal. Royal disclaimed coverage upon the ground that Ozolins’ action fell within a policy exclusion for “bodily injury * * * which is expected or intended by the insured.” Ozolins defaulted in the civil action and plaintiff entered a default…
Fuente: Caselaw Access Project, Harvard Law School Library Innovation Lab (static.case.law); New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division; 302 A.D.2d 670; 754 N.Y.S.2d 721. Datos: https://static.case.law/ad2d/302/cases/0670-01.json. Opinión judicial de EE.UU. sin restricciones conocidas de uso: CAP levantó las restricciones el 2024-03-01 (prensa); el espejo HF free-law declara cc0-1.0; NO c… Abrir la fuente
Cargando el texto completo…
Carmean v. Royal Indemnity Co., 302 A.D.2d 670 (New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division, 2003) Lahtinen, J. Appeal from an order and judgment of the Supreme Court (Nolan, Jr., J.), entered December 10, 2001 in Saratoga County, which, inter alia, granted defendant Royal Indemnity Company’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint against it. Plaintiff seeks to compel defendant Royal Indemnity Company to indemnify its insured, defendant Peter A. Ozolins, for a default judgment that plaintiff obtained against Ozolins as a result of Ozolins cutting off plaintiff’s left ear with a knife. On July 5, 1997, plaintiff was sitting in the front passenger seat of Ozolins’ parked vehicle with his feet hanging out the window and his back to Ozolins while the two individuals engaged in a discussion. Ozolins removed a knife from his pocket, reached across the front of the vehicle from his position in the driver’s seat and cut off plaintiff’s left ear. Ozolins was arrested upon a charge of first degree assault and, in September 1997, entered a plea of guilty to second degree assault. Thereafter, plaintiff commenced a personal injury action against Ozolins. Ozolins resided with his parents, who had a homeowners’ insurance policy with Royal. Royal disclaimed coverage upon the ground that Ozolins’ action fell within a policy exclusion for “bodily injury * * * which is expected or intended by the insured.” Ozolins defaulted in the civil action and plaintiff entered a default…