Cargando…
Fuente: Caselaw Access Project, Harvard Law School Library Innovation Lab (static.case.law); Supreme Court of Georgia; 820 S.E.2d 673; 304 Ga. 616. Datos: https://static.case.law/se2d/820/cases/0673-01.json. Opinión judicial de EE.UU. sin restricciones conocidas de uso: CAP levantó las restricciones el 2024-03-01 (prensa); el espejo HF free-law declara cc0-1.0; NO c… Abrir la fuente
Cargando el texto completo…
Bishop v. State, 820 S.E.2d 673 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2018) BETHEL, Justice. Following appellant Harold Bishop's third trial for the murder of his wife, Sherry Bishop, he was convicted of felony murder and has filed this appeal. His single claim of error is that the trial court erred in admitting certain statements made by the victim under the necessity exception to the rule against hearsay contained in our old Evidence Code. See former OCGA § 24-3-1. For the reasons that follow, we find no error and affirm. 1. Viewed in the light most favorable to the verdicts, the evidence presented at trial showed the following. Two days before she died, Sherry called Sheriff Ralph Kellett and told him that appellant was going to kill her. Sheriff Kellett did not take action after speaking on the phone with appellant, who assured him everything was fine. On the evening of January 21, 1996, law enforcement officers responded to a telephone call from appellant, in which he said that he had killed his wife. Upon arrival at the home, officers found Sherry deceased from two gunshot wounds, one to her neck and one to her left eye. Her body was sitting upright in a living room chair with her legs crossed. A bowl of food was in the crook of her right arm, and a bent fork was in her left hand. The officers found a shotgun on a nearby couch and a pistol on a table next to Sherry. Appellant had a long history of inflicting violence upon Sherry, whom he had married in 1968, divorced in 1977, and…
Fuente: Caselaw Access Project, Harvard Law School Library Innovation Lab (static.case.law); Supreme Court of Georgia; 820 S.E.2d 673; 304 Ga. 616. Datos: https://static.case.law/se2d/820/cases/0673-01.json. Opinión judicial de EE.UU. sin restricciones conocidas de uso: CAP levantó las restricciones el 2024-03-01 (prensa); el espejo HF free-law declara cc0-1.0; NO c… Abrir la fuente
Cargando el texto completo…
Bishop v. State, 820 S.E.2d 673 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2018) BETHEL, Justice. Following appellant Harold Bishop's third trial for the murder of his wife, Sherry Bishop, he was convicted of felony murder and has filed this appeal. His single claim of error is that the trial court erred in admitting certain statements made by the victim under the necessity exception to the rule against hearsay contained in our old Evidence Code. See former OCGA § 24-3-1. For the reasons that follow, we find no error and affirm. 1. Viewed in the light most favorable to the verdicts, the evidence presented at trial showed the following. Two days before she died, Sherry called Sheriff Ralph Kellett and told him that appellant was going to kill her. Sheriff Kellett did not take action after speaking on the phone with appellant, who assured him everything was fine. On the evening of January 21, 1996, law enforcement officers responded to a telephone call from appellant, in which he said that he had killed his wife. Upon arrival at the home, officers found Sherry deceased from two gunshot wounds, one to her neck and one to her left eye. Her body was sitting upright in a living room chair with her legs crossed. A bowl of food was in the crook of her right arm, and a bent fork was in her left hand. The officers found a shotgun on a nearby couch and a pistol on a table next to Sherry. Appellant had a long history of inflicting violence upon Sherry, whom he had married in 1968, divorced in 1977, and…